Medical Device Lawsuit Information
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Review
Some spinal cord stimulators have reportedly malfunctioned, leading to complications that require corrective surgery. Learn whether a free legal case review may be available.
See If You May Qualify for a Free Case Review
Your Implanted Device
Was an Abbott®, Boston Scientific®, Medtronic®, Nevro®, or St. Jude Medical® spinal cord stimulator implanted?
Select the response that best matches your situation.
- Free Case Review
- No Obligation
- Legal Support
Understanding the Problem
Common Spinal Cord
Stimulator Malfunctions
Devices intended to manage chronic pain may experience mechanical, electrical, or communication problems. Not every device issue is grounds for a legal claim.
Lead fractures or damage
Broken or damaged electrode leads
Lead migration
Leads moving from their intended position
Premature battery failure
Battery stops working earlier than expected
Controller problems
Device stops responding or cannot communicate
Stuck in MRI mode
System does not return to intended operation
Overheating or burns
Concerns during charging or use
Burning or electric shocks
Unexpected painful sensations
Other device failures
Additional documented malfunction issues
Qualifying Criteria
Who May Qualify for a Case Review?
A potential claim generally requires an eligible manufacturer’s device, a malfunction, and a qualifying corrective surgical procedure.
An eligible device was implanted
Abbott®, Boston Scientific®, Medtronic®, Nevro®, or St. Jude Medical® spinal cord stimulator system.
A device problem occurred
Examples include lead damage, early battery failure, unexpected shocks, charging problems, or loss of communication.
Corrective surgery was completed or scheduled
Surgery to remove or replace the malfunctioning device has occurred or is scheduled.
Device Recognition
Understanding the implant system
An implanted generator is connected to leads positioned near the spinal cord.
Illustrative device graphic. Not a specific product model.
Corrective Procedures
When a Malfunction Leads to Another Surgery
Some patients may need surgery to remove or replace malfunctioning spinal cord stimulation systems. In other situations, surgery has been scheduled but not yet performed.
The circumstances surrounding the device and any corrective procedures can help a Case Manager understand whether a legal review may be appropriate.
Serious Injury Criteria
Complications That May Strengthen a Claim
Some qualifying cases also involve significant injury or additional treatment following the malfunction.
- Permanent nerve damage or weakness
- Paralysis
- Serious infection or sepsis
- Spinal fluid leak
- Severe worsening of chronic pain
- More than one surgery to repair the device
About Sokolove Law
Experience. Guidance. Support.
Sokolove Law helps people and families explore legal options involving injuries and potentially defective products. A case review can help clarify what information may matter and what comes next.
45+
Years of firm experience
Free
Initial case review
No Fee
Unless compensation is recovered*
PlaceholderThe 45-year figure and the fee terms (*) are pending legal confirmation.
Helpful Answers
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which spinal cord stimulator manufacturers are included?
- Abbott®, Boston Scientific®, Medtronic®, Nevro®, and St. Jude Medical®.
- Does every device malfunction qualify?
- We require removal or replacement surgery that was completed or scheduled.
- What if surgery is only scheduled?
- Speak directly to our Case Managers to discuss the details about your situation.
- Does completing the form mean I have a lawsuit?
- No. The information submitted is reviewed to determine whether additional legal evaluation may be appropriate.
Explore Your Options
Have Questions About a Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction?
Find out whether a device malfunction and corrective surgery may qualify for a free legal case review. There is no obligation to move forward.
Answer a few questions to get started.